Committee Member Dashboard

Review applications, evaluate candidates, and participate in faculty selection processes.

Application Review

Review and evaluate faculty applications assigned to your committee.

Pending Review

8
+2 this week

Completed Reviews

12
+3 this week

Review Deadline

5 days
Due March 25, 2024

Average Score

4.2
+0.3 this month

Dr. Sarah Johnson

Pending Review High Priority

Position: Assistant Professor - Computer Science

Submitted: March 15, 2024

Research Focus: Machine Learning, AI Ethics

Publications: 12 peer-reviewed papers

Deadline: March 25, 2024

Dr. Michael Chen

In Progress Medium Priority

Position: Associate Professor - Mathematics

Submitted: March 10, 2024

Research Focus: Applied Mathematics, Statistics

Publications: 18 peer-reviewed papers

Progress: 60% complete

Evaluation Criteria

Review the evaluation criteria and scoring guidelines for candidate assessment.

Research Excellence (40%)

  • Publication record and impact
  • Research funding and grants
  • Research collaborations
  • Innovation and creativity
Scoring: 1-5 scale (5 = Exceptional, 1 = Poor)

Teaching Effectiveness (30%)

  • Teaching evaluations and feedback
  • Course development and innovation
  • Student mentoring and advising
  • Pedagogical approaches
Scoring: 1-5 scale (5 = Exceptional, 1 = Poor)

Service and Leadership (20%)

  • Department and university service
  • Professional society involvement
  • Community engagement
  • Leadership roles and initiatives
Scoring: 1-5 scale (5 = Exceptional, 1 = Poor)

Fit and Potential (10%)

  • Alignment with department needs
  • Growth potential and trajectory
  • Cultural fit and values
  • Future contributions
Scoring: 1-5 scale (5 = Exceptional, 1 = Poor)

Detailed Scoring Guidelines

5 - Exceptional

Outstanding performance that significantly exceeds expectations. Clear evidence of excellence in all areas.

4 - Very Good

Strong performance that exceeds expectations. Evidence of excellence in most areas.

3 - Good

Solid performance that meets expectations. Evidence of competence in all areas.

2 - Fair

Below expectations. Some areas of concern or weakness.

1 - Poor

Significantly below expectations. Major areas of concern or weakness.

Committee Collaboration

Collaborate with committee members and share evaluation insights.

Committee Members

5
3 internal, 2 external

Active Discussions

3
+1 this week

Next Meeting

2 days
March 25, 2024

Shared Notes

8
+2 this week

Committee Members

Dr. Alice Smith (Chair)

Computer Science Department

Role: Committee Chair

Active

Dr. Bob Johnson

Computer Science Department

Role: Internal Member

Active

Dr. Carol Williams

MIT (External)

Role: External Member

Active

Collaboration Tools

Recent Discussions

Research Focus Discussion
Active

Started by: Dr. Alice Smith

Topic: Evaluating AI/ML research contributions

Last Activity: 2 hours ago

My Assignments

Track your assigned applications and review progress.

Total Assigned

8
+2 this week

In Progress

3
+1 this week

Completed

5
+2 this week

Average Score

4.2
+0.3 this month

Dr. Sarah Johnson - Computer Science

Pending High Priority

Assigned: March 15, 2024

Deadline: March 25, 2024

Progress: 0% complete

Estimated Time: 4 hours

Dr. Michael Chen - Mathematics

In Progress Medium Priority

Assigned: March 10, 2024

Deadline: March 22, 2024

Progress: 60% complete

Time Spent: 2.5 hours